From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Omar Kilani" <omar(at)tinysofa(dot)org>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: License For Contribution [Was: Re: Ready to launch?] |
Date: | 2004-12-20 20:50:37 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E452802C@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Joshua D. Drake
> Sent: 20 December 2004 20:37
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Omar Kilani; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: License For Contribution [Was: Re: [pgsql-www]
> Ready to launch?]
>
>
> What I am seeing in this discussion is that want to keep exclusive
> rights to the original image but that all the code is BSD licensed.
Yes, that is basically the issue.
>
> It is going to be too much of a pain in the butt. If that is the
> route they are going to be take then I will have my artist
> create a new
> elephant from scratch that we will be BSD licensed and
> copyright to the
> project.
>
> We don't want to have to deal with this later.
Yes, this is my concern. Either keeping the elephant outside CVS, or
rewriting the licence with a specific exception for it will be a pain
imho. If you can source an alternative, that would certainly help :-)
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-12-20 20:54:15 | Re: License For Contribution [Was: Re: Ready to launch?] |
Previous Message | Omar Kilani | 2004-12-20 20:49:37 | Re: License For Contribution [Was: Re: Ready to launch?] |