Re: New site - minor problem

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New site - minor problem
Date: 2004-12-06 21:40:12
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4527D32@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Hansen [mailto:john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au]
> Sent: 06 December 2004 21:31
> To: Joshua D. Drake
> Cc: Dave Page; Gavin M. Roy; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] New site - minor problem
>
> > I would say, if there is not a reasonably open source
> alternative then
> > go for it... I have not problem with us using a closed
> source module
> > if it is the best for the job.
>
> What's wrong with using maxmind's ip2country database?
>
> Having read the thread, I'm still unclear as to what the
> problem really is.

The problem is that we go to great lengths to mirror the site and
minimise the points of failure, and then add code in that forces all
selection of those mirrors downloads of our software through 1 database
dependent script that provides very little benefit to the end user.

My earlier concern was that it would have too great of an effect on our
leased line, but having looked at the server logs and done a little
math, I realise now I was worrying about nothing.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Hansen 2004-12-06 21:54:30 Re: New site - minor problem
Previous Message John Hansen 2004-12-06 21:31:10 Re: New site - minor problem