From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Alexey Borzov" <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su> |
Cc: | <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New site - minor problem |
Date: | 2004-12-06 13:27:48 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4527D06@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexey Borzov [mailto:borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su]
> Sent: 06 December 2004 13:19
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] New site - minor problem
>
> Ok, I see.
>
> But then I have another question: why are we moving the
> dynamic site from one inadequate server (due to overload) to
> the other (due to bandwidth limits)?
Bandwidth should not be an issue except for *possibly* the ip2country
thing, which as I've stated on a number of occasions is, in my opinion,
a lot of overhead for very little gain on any server.
Regardless however, I doubt 2megs will cause any problems - like I said,
I'm being cautious.
> Especially when there
> were proposals of better hosting options on this list?
None that I'm aware of that gave us the level of control over software
installation/backups etc. that we like.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2004-12-06 13:32:20 | Re: launching new site |
Previous Message | Alexey Borzov | 2004-12-06 13:18:50 | Re: New site - minor problem |