Re: New ftp layout

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org]
> Sent: 03 December 2004 13:38
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers; blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr
> Subject: RE: [pgadmin-hackers] New ftp layout
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Dave Page wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure there are enough different Oss are there? The longest
> > directory at the moment only has 12 entries in it, and even if that
> > doubles I don't think it will be hard to find what you need.
>
> Mine is nearly the same layout as PostgreSQL.org. Look:

Didn't we just have a discussion about how virtually every release of pg
is structured differently under the binaries directory?

:-)

> http://developer.pgadmin.org/ftp2/release/v1.2.0/
>
> This seems so untidy to me...

Seems OK to me. I think having an OS/Version structure could prove less
friendly - for example, for the last release, I used slackware 9, for
this one, slackware 9.1 and probably for the next slackware 10, or even
higher. This would have left a structure like:

v1.0.0
slackware
9.0
v1.0.1
slackware
9.0
v1.0.2
slackware
9.0
v1.2.0
slackware
9.1
v1.X.0
slackware
10.0

Similar situations exist for other OS's. That just seems over the top to
me.

Does anyone else share Devrim's concern?

Regards, Dave