From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Hugo Ferreira" <hmf(at)inescporto(dot)pt>, <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgadmin-support] corrections v1.2 rc2: rpm 4 madrake 10.1 |
Date: | 2004-12-02 09:35:18 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4527C27@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgadmin-support |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgadmin-support-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgadmin-support-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of
> Hugo Ferreira
> Sent: 01 December 2004 10:10
> To: pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [pgadmin-support] corrections v1.2 rc2: rpm 4 madrake 10.1
>
> Hi,
Hello,
> I have had to change the src.rpm spec file and the configure
> file to be able to generate a rpm for Mandrake 10.1. Changes:
>
> 1. Mandrake 10.1 makes available the wxGTK2.5-2.5.3 and
> related packages. Only the dynamic versions of the library
> are created, so the specs must not use the static configuration flag.
OK.
> 2. Mandrake 10.1 makes available the wxGTK2.5-2.5.3 and
> related packages but these install to the "/usr" directory
> and not the "/usr/local" so the spec file must also have the
> configuration flag altered.
OK.
> 3. The library names of the wxGTK package are:
> - wx_gtk2_xrc-2.5
> - wx_gtk2_html-2.5
> - wx_gtk2_adv-2.5
> - wx_gtk2_core-2.5 -lwx_base_xml-2.5
> - wx_base_net-2.5 -lwx_base-2.5
> Because of this the configure script must add a new entry in
> the case switch to search for and use substring "gtk2_" and
> not "gtk2-".
OK.
> I have altered the rc2 src.rpm package and used that to
> generate a new src.rpm that can build binary packages for MDK
> 10.1. I can make this available if anyone wants, just tell me
> were to upload it. Please note that this package has a set of
> minimum changes and does not comply to Mandrake standards
> (doesn't check for package dependencies for example).
Can someone else comment on whether that is likely to cause problems?
I'm not well versed in the ways of the RPM!
>
> Spec file line changed:
> ----------------------------
> %configure --with-wx-config=%{withwxconfig} --with-wx=/usr
That's no problem - we have a couple of variations of the spec files for
different Oss already so another one can be added.
That said, it would be good to get one all-knowing all-purpose spec
file. Does anyone know if that's do-able? Perhaps it could be
autogenerated as part of the build process?
> configure diff:
> ------------------
>
> 5201a5202,5205
> > *wx_gtk2_*)
> > LIBS="$LIBS -lwx_gtk2_stc-${WX_VERSION}"
> > LIBS="$LIBS $WX_NEW_LDFLAGS"
> > ;;
> 5206c5210
> <
> ---
> >
No problem there either. Can I get some additional opinions thouogh
before I apply these changes?
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2004-12-02 17:51:55 | Re: RPMs for Fedora Core 1-3 |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2004-12-02 09:13:05 | Re: Arabic translation |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Troels Arvin | 2004-12-02 09:39:08 | Re: string.cpp assertion failure |
Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-12-02 08:53:17 | Re: string.cpp assertion failure |