| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, "pgadmin-hackers" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Going for Gold |
| Date: | 2004-11-29 14:43:31 |
| Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4527B98@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of
> Andreas Pflug
> Sent: 29 November 2004 10:24
> To: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Going for Gold
>
> Hi friends,
>
> seems pgAdmin III 1.2RC is matured, should we make it Gold
> now? Tom Lane promised to avoid further changes to the pgsql
> system schema, so hopefully we won't face similar problems as
> with beta4->beta5 again.
>
> As soon as pgsql8.0 is out, we can roll 1.2.1 to update the
> documentation to the release version, but we shouldn't delay
> 1.2.0 for it.
Sounds good to me. Are the docs/screenshots/pg docs etc up to date?
I can probably roll it tomorrow.... (following which I'll branch for
-patches)
/D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-11-29 15:32:35 | Re: Going for Gold |
| Previous Message | Troels Arvin | 2004-11-29 11:39:00 | Re: Going for Gold |