From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Raphaël Enrici <blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr>, "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | "pgadmin-hackers" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: RFC: Update wizard |
Date: | 2004-11-21 22:50:20 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4307259@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr]
> Sent: 21 November 2004 21:39
> To: Dave Page; Andreas Pflug
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RFC: Update wizard
>
>
> What are you thinking about exactly ? A way to specify an external
> script/command to launch or something ? Under Linux and maybe
> others, I
> think that updaters generally do exactly the same thing, but
> generally
> less efficiently, as the native packaging systems. Example: I
> love the
> pear system for php but I consider that it clashes with the native
> packaging tools under Debian... By using pear system you get
> unpackaged
> files installed on your system.
> And what about things partly installed (example data files not up to
> date with binaries) which may break the app...
>
> I'd be for something advertising a new version but not more.
> Unless we
> have something really open and customisable to suits the needs of all
> OSes packagers.
Yeah, that's the downside. On some apps I've used on Windows, it's nice get have the app download a new version of itself, and spawn a new process to move the new version into place and run it. Makes it all seamless and very slick. Doesn't fit in well with Linux packaging schemes though does it :-(
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-11-22 15:44:52 | Re: bug on debian... what's wrong with me ? |
Previous Message | Raphaël Enrici | 2004-11-21 21:39:17 | Re: RFC: Update wizard |