Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Ned Lilly" <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>, "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>, "Omar Kilani" <omar(at)tinysofa(dot)org>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <emily(at)tinysofa(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Date: 2004-10-27 21:40:46
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4306E3B@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: 27 October 2004 18:48
> To: Joshua D. Drake
> Cc: Ned Lilly; Gavin M. Roy; Omar Kilani;
> pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org; pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org;
> emily(at)tinysofa(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org
> Design Proposal
>
> In this case, about all I could see without scrolling right
> was the content-free logo and picture ... so I wasn't real impressed.

I have to agree. Not only the size itself, but the design loses much of
the contentfrom the front page that over the last couple of years we
have found valuable to include.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2004-10-27 21:42:49 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Previous Message Emily Boyd 2004-10-27 21:36:44 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2004-10-27 21:42:49 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Previous Message Emily Boyd 2004-10-27 21:36:44 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal