Re: get_progname and .exe suffix

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: get_progname and .exe suffix
Date: 2004-10-15 14:12:26
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4306C04@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of
> Andrew Dunstan
> Sent: 15 October 2004 15:07
> To: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: [HACKERS] get_progname and .exe suffix
>
>
> Somewhere along the way, probably when we moved to using a
> generalised get_progname(), that seems to have been lost. Not
> only is keeping the .exe suffix ugly, but it breaks the
> contrib installcheck regression tests on windows (hasn't
> anyone run these?)

Yes, and reported the problem...

Regards, Dave

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-10-15 15:16:05 Re: plperl Safe restrictions
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-10-15 14:06:54 get_progname and .exe suffix