From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | <blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr>, <diego(at)adminsa(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: " keywords... Is it normal ? |
Date: | 2004-09-10 08:22:58 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E430638A@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr [mailto:blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr]
> Sent: 10 September 2004 10:03
> To: diego(at)adminsa(dot)com
> Cc: pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de; Dave Page;
> pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] " keywords... Is it normal ?
>
>
> Also add the user name in the grant statements.
> I've read some thread implying Andreas and quoted keywords.
> I think Andreas or Dave added such feature to prevent some
> misbehaviour while using reserved words in some conditions
> but I don't know/remember/understand the scope of these modifications.
> IMHO it should be reviewed as it breaks part of the tool.
Andreas tweaked it a bit a little while ago:
http://cvs.pgadmin.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/pgadmin3/src/utils/misc.cpp.d
iff?r1=1.54&r2=1.55
Seems we need a way to exclude keywords when used in their 'keyword
defining' context (if that makes any sense :-) ).
Regards, Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-09-10 08:29:58 | Dave gets out the office for a change |
Previous Message | Diego A. Gil | 2004-09-10 04:28:41 | Re: " keywords... Is it normal ? |