From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | <blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Ready to roll beta |
Date: | 2004-09-08 08:31:53 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E41A7A67@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de]
> Sent: 08 September 2004 09:29
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr; pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Also, don't forget that everything at release is built from
> the source
> > tarball, and not CVS (at least it should be). So once that
> is created,
> > that's it.
>
> I meant to release Beta1 win32 as binary only.
Yes, but to do that (properly) I need to produce the tarball first.
That's the best way to ensure consistent releases. Or are you saying
that we ignore consistency in this instance?
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-09-08 08:45:36 | Re: Ready to roll beta |
Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-09-08 08:28:58 | Re: Ready to roll beta |