From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers-win32" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Win32 Event log |
Date: | 2004-08-12 20:04:23 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E41A76FC@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-win32-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-win32-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf
> Of Andrew Dunstan
> Sent: 12 August 2004 18:15
> To: pgsql-hackers-win32
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [PATCHES] Win32 Event log
>
>
> I am more and more coming to the conclusion that we should
> either remove
> NT4 as a supported platform, or at least surround it with
> very significant caveats. M$ is about to end the last
> remaining bit of support for it, and has already stopped
> publishing non-security fixes.
>
> It looks like there are lots of legacy installations still
> out there (heck, I see lots of RH7.3 and it's also out of support).
>
> But there isn't any legacy native W32 Postgres, so we would
> not be affecting any legacy users by not supporting NT4.
>
> Thoughts?
Agreed. I did email the other day asking for it to be removed from the
release notes. The installer *will not* work on NT as it stands, and
that is what 99.99% of Windows users will try to install. In addition,
Andreas' symlink code certainly won't work on < SP4, and I have my
doubts whether it will work on SP4 - I've found nothing on the net to
indicate it will, despite it being 'compatible' with NTFS5.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-08-12 20:11:00 | Re: [PATCHES] Win32 Event log |
Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-08-12 19:40:11 | Re: [GENERAL] error moving table to tablespace |