| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)qwest(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Windows binary in the beta directory? |
| Date: | 2004-08-09 07:30:01 |
| Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E41A765D@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Scott Marlowe
> Sent: 09 August 2004 06:31
> To: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: [HACKERS] Windows binary in the beta directory?
>
> Since this is the first release supporting Windows natively,
> and Windows people tend to not have any development
> environment by default, should there be a windows binary
> version of some sort into the beta directory, or is that
> something that will come along later with setup.exe type
> packaging or something?
I hope to roll one today...
/D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-08-09 07:30:09 | Re: Postgres development model (was Re: CVS comment) |
| Previous Message | James William Pye | 2004-08-09 07:29:46 | SRFs ExecMakeTableFunctionResult |