| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question |
| Date: | 2005-02-27 19:52:00 |
| Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E407B525@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-hackers-win32-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org on behalf of Bruce Momjian
Sent: Sun 2/27/2005 12:54 AM
To: Magnus Hagander
Cc: Tom Lane; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org; Merlin Moncure
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
> Patch applied. Thanks.
>
> I assume this is not approprate for 8.0.X.
I think it would be good to backpatch it given proper testing - the changes are relatively minor, and they do give a significant performance boost.
Regards, Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-02-27 20:01:45 | Re: Development Plans |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-02-27 18:07:16 | snprintf causes regression tests to fail |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2005-02-28 13:16:53 | Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-02-27 18:07:16 | snprintf causes regression tests to fail |