From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
Cc: | <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <neyinagho(at)yahoo(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Thesis on PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2004-09-04 22:26:01 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E407B3F5@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org on behalf of D'Arcy J.M. Cain
Sent: Sat 9/4/2004 2:24 PM
To: Jim C. Nasby
Cc: peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net; neyinagho(at)yahoo(dot)com; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Thesis on PostgreSQL
> The only "generation" differentiation I have ever heard about in general
> use was based on the language used to talk to the database. In that
> sense PostgreSQL is 3GL (SQL) and plpgsql might be 4GL. Progress is a
> 4GL. I'm not sure that's a feature though.
First week of a database module I did at Uni some years back discussed generations of database along the lines of:
File systems/flat storage
Hierarchical databases (IMS)
Network databases(CODASYL)
Relational Databases (RDBMS)
Object Relational Databases (ORDBMS)
Which of course puts us as the latest generation. Dunno about Oracle...
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2004-09-04 22:44:32 | Re: APR 1.0 released |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2004-09-04 22:25:58 | Adding columns in the middle of tables |