Re: Suggestion for improving Archives

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Suggestion for improving Archives
Date: 2004-09-04 10:42:55
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E407B3EA@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org on behalf of Josh Berkus
Sent: Fri 9/3/2004 5:19 PM
To: PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List
Subject: [pgsql-www] Suggestion for improving Archives

> Both of those resources are faster and better search engines than the Mhonarc
> search could ever be, and neither eats CPU time on hub.org. Yes?

Um, Mhonarc is the mail to html program which will still be required, and none of the searches run on hub.org currently anyway.

Regards, Dave

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2004-09-04 12:57:06 Re: Suggestion for improving Archives
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-09-03 16:19:14 Suggestion for improving Archives