Re: Release stamping (Was: [CORE] Schedule for release?)

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Release stamping (Was: [CORE] Schedule for release?)
Date: 2006-10-24 14:59:25
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40176D86F@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net]
> Sent: 24 October 2006 15:56
> To: Tom Lane; Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Release stamping (Was: [CORE] Schedule
> for release?)
>
> Getting late into this discussion, so I may be completely off here :-)
> How's that going to work+ pg_config.h.win32 needs to know
> win32 platform
> specifics, right? So it has to be created, in that case, on win32. But
> when you're building with MSVC, you don't run configure,
> because windows
> can't run that (without the mingw layer).

Sorry - we're just talking about getting the version number in there
automatically to avoid it getting forgotten during release bundling.

Regards, Dave.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-10-24 15:02:35 Re: Release stamping (Was: [CORE] Schedule for release?)
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2006-10-24 14:56:31 Conference materials (Was: [HACKERS] pdfs of the conference)