From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Bort, Paul" <pbort(at)tmwsystems(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Adding a pgbench run to buildfarm |
Date: | 2006-07-24 07:31:01 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40154C135@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Bort, Paul
> Sent: 24 July 2006 04:52
> To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [HACKERS] Adding a pgbench run to buildfarm
>
> -hackers,
>
> With help from Andrew Dunstan, I'm adding the ability to do a pgbench
> run after all of the other tests during a buildfarm run.
>
> Andrew said I should solicit opinions as to what parameters to use. A
> cursory search through the archives led me to pick a scaling factor of
> 10, 5 users, and 100 transactions. All of these will be
> adjustable using
> the build-farm.conf mechanism already in place.
>
> Comments? Suggestions?
Please ensure the run is optional. The machine hosting Snake and
Bandicoot is currently running 16 builds a day, and I'd prefer not to
significantly add to it's load.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Golden Liu | 2006-07-24 08:20:34 | UPDATE/DELETE XXX WHERE CURRENT OF cursor_name |
Previous Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2006-07-24 06:54:44 | Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes |