From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Joshua Reich" <josh(at)root(dot)net> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Patch process? |
Date: | 2006-07-19 15:19:04 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40154C0BA@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Marko Kreen
> Sent: 19 July 2006 16:13
> To: Joshua Reich
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch process?
>
> On 7/19/06, Joshua Reich <josh(at)root(dot)net> wrote:
> > Just a general question - I submitted a patch for
> contrib/cube (adding a
> > new function & converting everything from V0 to V1), what
> is the process
> > from here onwards? Do we have an active maintainer of this
> code? How is
> > it reviewed?
>
> You should post into -patches@ list, then some core member will
> review and apply it.
Not core, a committer. Although some people are both, not all are. If
that makes sense!
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2006-07-19 15:34:08 | Re: Patch process? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-19 15:17:33 | Re: Patch process? |