| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it |
| Date: | 2006-07-16 18:28:33 |
| Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40154BF8E@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com]
> Sent: 16 July 2006 19:04
> To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Cc: Tom Lane; Andrew Dunstan; Dave Page
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
>
> Andrew, Tom:
>
> I'm putting a solicitation in this week's PWN for more
> Windows buildfarm
> members. With 250,000 Windows+PostgreSQL users out there,
> you'd think a few
> people would step up.
>
> Dave, I think you may need to give Andrew Windows buildfarm
> instructions to
> put up at www.pgbuildfarm.org.
<grin>It was Andrew that gave me instructions! I'll see if I can write
up the important points though.
/D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-16 18:34:40 | Re: Possible explanation for Win32 stats regression test failures |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2006-07-16 18:21:02 | Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it |