Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "John DeSoi" <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>
Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bort, Paul" <pbort(at)tmwsystems(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions
Date: 2006-06-23 14:14:45
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E401388B41@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John DeSoi [mailto:desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com]
> Sent: 23 June 2006 14:56
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Andrew Dunstan; Tom Lane; Bort, Paul; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions
>
>
> On Jun 23, 2006, at 3:10 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>
> > Is there any real reason to continue to support Cygwin? We've always
> > said it's not a first class port, and now we have the native port
> > which
> > is it seems somewhat pointless expending further effort on it.
>
>
> Are all the tools needed to compile from source on Win32 freely
> available?

Yes. Even when/if we add a VC++ build they will be.

Regards, Dave.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-06-23 14:14:46 Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions
Previous Message Tzahi Fadida 2006-06-23 14:12:14 Re: Planning without reason.