From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, <steve(dot)poe(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? |
Date: | 2006-06-14 18:43:41 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E401388954@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
________________________________
From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com]
Sent: 14 June 2006 18:04
To: Dave Page
Cc: Joshua D. Drake; steve(dot)poe(at)gmail(dot)com;
pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: [PERFORM] Which processor runs better for
Postgresql?
On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 15:11, Dave Page wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> And how old are the 2600's now?
>
> Anyhoo, I'm not saying the current machines are excellent
performers or
> anything, but there are good business reasons to run them if
you don't
> need to squeeze out every last pony.
Just thought I'd point you to Dell's forums.
http://forums.us.dell.com/supportforums/board?board.id=pes_linux&page=1
<http://forums.us.dell.com/supportforums/board?board.id=pes_linux&page=1
>
wherein you'll find plenty of folks who have problems with
freezing RAID
controllers with 28xx and 18xx machines.
<shrug>Never had any such problems in the dozen or so machines we run
(about a 50-50 split of Linux to Windows).
Regards, Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Antoine | 2006-06-14 19:04:10 | Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax? |
Previous Message | John Vincent | 2006-06-14 18:11:19 | Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0 |