Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql?

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, <steve(dot)poe(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql?
Date: 2006-06-14 18:43:41
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E401388954@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

________________________________

From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com]
Sent: 14 June 2006 18:04
To: Dave Page
Cc: Joshua D. Drake; steve(dot)poe(at)gmail(dot)com;
pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: [PERFORM] Which processor runs better for
Postgresql?

On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 15:11, Dave Page wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----

> And how old are the 2600's now?
>
> Anyhoo, I'm not saying the current machines are excellent
performers or
> anything, but there are good business reasons to run them if
you don't
> need to squeeze out every last pony.

Just thought I'd point you to Dell's forums.


http://forums.us.dell.com/supportforums/board?board.id=pes_linux&page=1
<http://forums.us.dell.com/supportforums/board?board.id=pes_linux&page=1
>

wherein you'll find plenty of folks who have problems with
freezing RAID
controllers with 28xx and 18xx machines.

<shrug>Never had any such problems in the dozen or so machines we run
(about a 50-50 split of Linux to Windows).

Regards, Dave

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Antoine 2006-06-14 19:04:10 Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax?
Previous Message John Vincent 2006-06-14 18:11:19 Re: Performance of pg_dump on PGSQL 8.0