Re: Building with Visual C++

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Chuck McDevitt" <cmcdevitt(at)greenplum(dot)com>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Building with Visual C++
Date: 2006-04-24 21:35:25
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4011C9EF7@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-patches-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-patches-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: 24 April 2006 21:57
> To: Magnus Hagander
> Cc: Chuck McDevitt; pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Building with Visual C++
>
> We'll need a VC buildfarm member in place to catch us anytime
> we change the Makefiles in a way that the script doesn't
> understand. Before the buildfarm existed I'd have been
> skeptical of whether even the conversion-script approach
> would be viable in the long run, but with timely info about
> breakages I think it can work.

Not a problem - Snake has VC++ 6, 2003 and 2005 installed.

Regards, Dave.

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2006-04-24 21:40:15 Re: Building with Visual C++
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-04-24 21:23:47 Re: Building with Visual C++