Re: Gborg still down

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Gborg still down
Date: 2006-04-21 19:41:00
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4011C9EBF@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joshua D. Drake [mailto:jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com]
> Sent: 21 April 2006 20:05
> To: Magnus Hagander
> Cc: Marc G. Fournier; Jim C. Nasby; Dave Page;
> greg(at)turnstep(dot)com; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Gborg still down
>
>
> > Because it makes more sense monitoring internet services from
> > *outside* the hosting network? ;-)
>
> Well of course :) That's what we do. We have a server that
> sits somewhere else entirely that does our nagios.
>
> My main point was it seems that this is something hub should
> be invovled in sense a lot of the core servers are hosted by hub.

Most of the servers are not hosted by hub these days - we have them
pretty well distributed around the world these days.

Regards, Dave

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-04-21 20:15:00 Re: Gborg still down
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-04-21 19:04:46 Re: Gborg still down