From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Hiroshi Inoue" <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Subject: | Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries |
Date: | 2006-04-13 11:48:06 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4011C9C9A@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martijn van Oosterhout [mailto:kleptog(at)svana(dot)org]
> Sent: 13 April 2006 12:34
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; Hiroshi Inoue
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Practical impediment to supporting
> multiple SSL libraries
>
> However, w.r.t. the copying, the pointers in get PGresult are
> in memory belonging to that result. As long as that PGresult
> hangs around, you should be able to just copy the pointers
> rather than the data? Or is this unacceptable?
It copies the data. I can't think offhand why it was implemented that
way, but then I didn't write the code (Anoop & Siva @ Pervasive did).
Anyhoo, as I've said, that approach has now been abandoned anyway in
favour of Hiroshi's, so it's him you'd need to convince to change. The
rest of us have only just started re-learning the code.
Regards, Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2006-04-13 11:55:32 | Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-04-13 11:34:05 | Re: Practical impediment to supporting multiple SSL libraries |