Re: Web code license

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Web code license
Date: 2006-03-17 10:02:17
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4011C9580@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Magnus Hagander
> Sent: 17 March 2006 09:58
> To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [pgsql-www] Web code license
>
> So...
>
> I'm looking at putting in the code for the "new techdocs" in cvs
> sometime soon, and realised I forgot this question :)
>
> The code uses tinymce (http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/) for visual
> editing.

There's a coincidence - guess what I've been hacking about all morning!

> This is LGPL code. My question is, should this be
> added to cvs
> (with appropriate license files etc, of course), or should it be kept
> outside (like the PEAR components we rely on for example).

It should be kept outside I think - perhaps under /files so it's nicely
seperated.

Regards, Dave.

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-03-17 10:03:16 Re: Web code license
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-03-17 09:57:47 Web code license