From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Bruce Raup" <brauplists(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Is Sourcewear defunct? |
Date: | 2006-02-28 13:59:04 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40103E4B1@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Robert Treat
> Sent: 28 February 2006 13:54
> To: Bruce Raup
> Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [pgsql-advocacy] Is Sourcewear defunct?
>
>
> This is the second report I've seen of recent purchases going
> unfulfilled and customers being unable to get in contact with anyone
> from the company. I'm inclined to remove the link from the home page
> unless we get someone from the company to address these issues.
Yes - we definitely don't want to be linking to a company claiming to
support us that don't deliver the goods they take money for. It's not
fair to the people that don't get their shirts etc, nor does it paint us
in a good light.
Regards, Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Mair | 2006-02-28 14:42:01 | Re: Is Sourcewear defunct? |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2006-02-28 13:54:21 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Is Sourcewear defunct? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Mair | 2006-02-28 14:42:01 | Re: Is Sourcewear defunct? |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2006-02-28 13:54:21 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Is Sourcewear defunct? |