Re: Search machine is ready

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Search machine is ready
Date: 2006-02-17 16:13:44
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40103E1CC@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net]
> Sent: 17 February 2006 15:55
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Search machine is ready
>
> Am Freitag, 17. Februar 2006 16:12 schrieb Dave Page:
> > I shall stick to building my own packages for all distros thank you.
>
> Please do, but please refrain from spreading FUD and relaying
> others' FUD.

I don't believe I did - I gave a reason why I prefer my own builds
(because I know the OS vendor hasn't patched the code), and referenced
one person who has direct experience supporting people with vendors
packages, and one who (correctly) said that various distros do indeed
distribute patched versions of PostgreSQL.

If I quoted or said anything that is innaccurate or untrue then I'll
gladly retract it, hang my head in shame and be pelted with virtual
rotten tomatoes, but I'm not going to ignore a direct question just in
case someone takes the answer as an insult to their OS of choice.

You should know me better than that by now :-)

Regards, Dave

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-02-17 16:40:29 Re: Search machine is ready
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-02-17 15:55:22 Re: Search machine is ready