From: | "Jie Liang" <jie(at)stbernard(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Kris Jurka" <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Prepare Statement |
Date: | 2004-06-18 16:43:38 |
Message-ID: | E7E213858379814A9AE48CA6754F5ECB03451962@mail01.stbernard.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc pgsql-sql |
Nope, I think you are right. The improvement of performance will be
minimal. Because that to parse "SELECT * FROM myfunction(?,?,?)" is very
very quick.
However, I am still thinking if I call one SELECT and one DELECT and one
UPDATE and one INSERT a thousand times against same table with different
arguments, should I consider performance iusse?
Secondly, I assume the function should be a pre-compiled object stored
on server side, doesn't it.
Thanks.
Jie Liang
-----Original Message-----
From: Kris Jurka [mailto:books(at)ejurka(dot)com]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 10:51 PM
To: Jie Liang
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org; pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Prepare Statement
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Jie Liang wrote:
> Hmm, intersting.
> I am using jdk 1.3.1, and pg74.213.jdbc2.jar driver, I hope this bug
> could be fixed in later version.
>
I suppose, but I'm going to put it pretty close to the bottom of my todo
list because it still works even though it doesn't use a server prepared
statement, and as I mentioned earlier the performance improvement if any
will be minimal. Have you done any testing to show that you are even
getting a performance gain?
Kris Jurka
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jie Liang | 2004-06-18 16:52:18 | Re: Prepare Statement |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-18 16:32:52 | Re: Nested transactions |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jie Liang | 2004-06-18 16:52:18 | Re: Prepare Statement |
Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2004-06-18 05:51:19 | Re: Prepare Statement |