Re: Index only select count(*)

From: Toni Helenius <Toni(dot)Helenius(at)syncrontech(dot)com>
To: Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Index only select count(*)
Date: 2013-10-07 09:34:08
Message-ID: E6A9CAA76548CB4EB02D2E3B174DD3B1EF9E189428@ink.sad.syncrontech.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi,

yes, I'm cheating by using GUI :) (PgAdmin)

Here:

"Aggregate (cost=18240.50..18240.51 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=2911.117..2911.119 rows=1 loops=1)"
" -> Seq Scan on min1_009 (cost=0.00..18108.60 rows=52760 width=0) (actual time=5.390..2816.274 rows=52760 loops=1)"
"Total runtime: 2912.211 ms"

-----Original Message-----
From: Alban Hertroys [mailto:haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com]
Sent: 7. lokakuuta 2013 12:31
To: Toni Helenius
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Index only select count(*)

On Oct 7, 2013, at 11:23, Toni Helenius <Toni(dot)Helenius(at)syncrontech(dot)com> wrote:

> The output of analyze:
> "Aggregate (cost=18240.50..18240.51 rows=1 width=0)"
> " -> Seq Scan on min1_009 (cost=0.00..18108.60 rows=52760 width=0)"

That's the output of Explain, not of Explain Analyze. The latter has actual measurements to go with the estimated costs, which gives a lot more insight.

Alban Hertroys
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees, cut the trees and you'll find there is no forest.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alban Hertroys 2013-10-07 09:54:01 Re: Index only select count(*)
Previous Message Alban Hertroys 2013-10-07 09:31:21 Re: Index only select count(*)