| From: | Ogden <lists(at)darkstatic(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | ktm(at)rice(dot)edu |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ |
| Date: | 2011-08-17 18:32:41 |
| Message-ID: | E6229A9F-876F-4604-900A-EC93C5B720AB@darkstatic.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Aug 17, 2011, at 1:31 PM, ktm(at)rice(dot)edu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 01:26:56PM -0500, Ogden wrote:
>> I am using bonnie++ to benchmark our current Postgres system (on RAID 5) with the new one we have, which I have configured with RAID 10. The drives are the same (SAS 15K). I tried the new system with ext3 and then XFS but the results seem really outrageous as compared to the current system, or am I reading things wrong?
>>
>> The benchmark results are here:
>>
>> http://malekkoheavyindustry.com/benchmark.html
>>
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> Ogden
>
> That looks pretty normal to me.
>
> Ken
But such a jump from the current db01 system to this? Over 20 times difference from the current system to the new one with XFS. Is that much of a jump normal?
Ogden
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gary Doades | 2011-08-17 18:33:13 | Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ |
| Previous Message | ktm@rice.edu | 2011-08-17 18:31:01 | Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ |