From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: generate_series() Interpretation |
Date: | 2011-06-27 18:06:35 |
Message-ID: | E472FE99-31AE-4DC7-BE9A-EB9883BF39AE@kineticode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jun 27, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> It is precisely to support such fancy things that some products
> support a more abstract date type which allows 31 days in any month,
> and then normalizes to real dates as needed. The PostgreSQL
> developer community has generally not been receptive to such use
> cases. I think you need to iterate through month intervals and add
> those to the starting date for now. If you want to start with the
> last day of a month with less than 31 days, you may need to back up
> a month or two to find a suitable month and offset your intervals by
> the appropriate number of months.
>
> I'd bet that if you encapsulate all that in a PostgreSQL function,
> you're not the only one who would find it useful.
Yeah, did that a while ago:
http://www.justatheory.com/computers/databases/postgresql/recurring_events.html
I think it could be simpler now, with generate_series() for some intervals.
Best,
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2011-06-27 18:08:58 | Commitfest 2001-06: 10 days in |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-06-27 18:05:23 | Re: per-column generic option |