Re: Rockwell FactoryTalk Says 'SQL_TIMESTAMP data type is not supported'

From: <michael(dot)riksman(at)khalda-eg(dot)com>
To: <h-inoue(at)dream(dot)email(dot)ne(dot)jp>
Cc: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rockwell FactoryTalk Says 'SQL_TIMESTAMP data type is not supported'
Date: 2019-07-23 04:24:54
Message-ID: E3D77610-4272-4EAF-8776-E3A8733B9062@khalda-eg.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

Hi Hiroshi,

I’ll try anything! Would be great to use PostgreSQL with an industrial software like Rockwell.

Thanks :)

Regards,

Michael Riksman

Sent from iPhone

On 23 Jul 2019, at 1:14 am, Inoue, Hiroshi <h-inoue(at)dream(dot)email(dot)ne(dot)jp> wrote:

 Hi Michael,

Could you try the test driver if I provide a Windows test driver?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

On 2019/07/18 18:18, michael(dot)riksman(at)khalda-eg(dot)com<mailto:michael(dot)riksman(at)khalda-eg(dot)com> wrote:
Hi,

· your ODBC driver version

psqlODBC is v11.01.000.

SQL_DRIVER_ODBC_VER reports “3.51”

[6608-0.002] info.c[PGAPI_GetInfo]71: entering...fInfoType=77

[6608-0.002] info.c[PGAPI_GetInfo]1032: p='03.51', len=0, value=0, cbMax=12

· your PostgreSQL database version

v10.9 x86

Running on Windows 10 32-bit

· any error messages you saw on the screen

The client application (Rockwell FactoryTalk), has a button which can automatically create the tables in an existing database.
It created a table successfully that DID NOT have a TIMESTAMP column. But I had to manually create two tables that had a TIMESTAMP column.
When I clicked ‘OK’ to accept the changes, I get this error;

<image001.png>

FactoryTalk works fine with Microsoft SQL ODBC.

· the debug log (mylog_????.log) file (you will have to enable the mylog driver option)

Attached.

I ran the ODBC Test tool, and connected via ODBC version 2 (as this is what FactoryTalk appears to be using)
[2892-0.001]odbcapi30.[SQLSetEnvAttr]477: Entering att=200,2

I then ran a GetTypeInfo on SQL_TIMESTAMP(11), and it returns SQL_SUCCESS
<image002.png>

But in the logs, it shows this;
[6608-1677.216]odbcapiw.c[SQLGetTypeInfoW]1015: Entering
[6608-1677.216] info.c[PGAPI_GetTypeInfo]1115: entering...fSqlType=93
[6608-1677.216]statement.[SC_recycle_statement]812: entering self=0052D2E0
[6608-1677.216] qresult.c[QR_Constructor]173: entering
[6608-1677.216] qresult.c[QR_Constructor]242: leaving
[6608-1677.216]statement.[SC_set_Result]531: (0052D2E0, 00539F48)
[6608-1677.216] qresult.c[QR_Destructor]344: entering
[6608-1677.216] bind.c[extend_column_bindings]718: entering ... self=0052D370, bindings_allocated=0, num_columns=19
[6608-1677.216] bind.c[extend_column_bindings]762: leaving 004F8C30
[6608-1677.216] qresult.c[QR_set_num_fields]40: entering
[6608-1677.216] qresult.c[QR_set_num_fields]44: leaving

It appears the fSQLType changed from SQL_TIMESTAMP(11) to SQL_TYPE_TIMESTAMP(93)…? Could this be what is causing the issue?

Regards,

Michael Riksman
Instrument and Control Specialist
Khalda Petroleum Co.
A KPC/Apache Corp. Joint Venture
Salam Base, Egypt
Mob: +20 122 0530603
Email: michael(dot)riksman(at)khalda-eg(dot)com<mailto:michael(dot)riksman(at)khalda-eg(dot)com>

[https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png]<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> ウイルス フリー。 www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Inoue, Hiroshi 2019-07-23 05:06:33 Re: Rockwell FactoryTalk Says 'SQL_TIMESTAMP data type is not supported'
Previous Message Inoue, Hiroshi 2019-07-22 23:14:26 Re: Rockwell FactoryTalk Says 'SQL_TIMESTAMP data type is not supported'