| From: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: psql command aliases support |
| Date: | 2008-04-03 14:43:19 |
| Message-ID: | E39E714BCFAAA675F207CEF8@imhotep.credativ.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
--On Freitag, April 04, 2008 01:11:51 +1100 Brendan Jurd
<direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> What is the virtue of allowing such a syntax in the first place? I
> can't think of any other context where it's okay to issue a command
> together with arguments without some kind of delimiter, for the
> obvious reason that it introduces ambiguities such as those Greg
> described.
Yeah, i always felt very uncomfortable with this behavior. Anyways, it's
too late to complain about that and it shouldn't block new features which
can increase usability on the other side.
--
Thanks
Bernd
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hell, Robert | 2008-04-03 14:45:30 | GUC parameter cursors_tuple_fraction |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-04-03 14:36:46 | Re: psql command aliases support |