Re: Does Type Have = Operator?

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Does Type Have = Operator?
Date: 2016-05-12 18:28:35
Message-ID: E34AEE59-C76B-4691-AEB1-4F79E6788821@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On May 12, 2016, at 11:19 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Yeah.. it's ugly but you can do something like that:

I could, but I won’t, since this is pgTAP and users of the library might have defined their own json operators.

Andrew Dunstan has done the yeoman’s work of creating such operators, BTW:

https://bitbucket.org/adunstan/jsoncmp

Some might argue that it ought to compare JSON objects, effectively be the equivalent of ::jsonb = ::jsonb, rather than ::text = ::text. But as Andrew points out to me offlist, “if that's what they want why aren't they using jsonb in the first place?”

So I think that, up to the introduction of JSONB, it was important not to side one way or the other and put a JSON = operator in core. But now what we have JSONB, perhaps it makes sense to finally take sides and intoduce JSON = that does plain text comparison. Thoughts?

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-05-12 18:29:48 Re: Use %u to print user mapping's umid and userid
Previous Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2016-05-12 18:19:52 Re: Does Type Have = Operator?