From: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres restart in the middle of exclusive backup and the presence of backup_label file |
Date: | 2022-01-07 00:48:21 |
Message-ID: | E2995C0D-9F02-430D-A787-E3A77FA914F9@amazon.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/2/21, 1:34 PM, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
> On 12/2/21, 9:50 AM, "David Steele" <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>> On 12/2/21 12:38, David Steele wrote:
>>> On 12/2/21 11:00, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Should we really be getting rid of
>>>> PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster::backup_fs_hot() ?
>>>
>>> Agreed, it would be better to update backup_fs_hot() to use exclusive
>>> mode and save out backup_label instead.
>>
>> Oops, of course I meant non-exclusive mode.
>
> +1. I'll fix that in the next revision.
I finally got around to looking into this, and I think I found why it
was done this way in 2018. backup_fs_hot() runs pg_start_backup(),
closes the session, copies the data, and then runs pg_stop_backup() in
a different session. This doesn't work with non-exclusive mode
because the backup will be aborted when the session that runs
pg_start_backup() is closed. pg_stop_backup() will fail with a
"backup is not in progress" error. Furthermore,
010_logical_decoding_timelines.pl seems to be the only test that uses
backup_fs_hot().
After a quick glance, I didn't see an easy way to hold a session open
while the test does other things. If there isn't one, modifying
backup_fs_hot() to work with non-exclusive mode might be more trouble
than it is worth.
Nathan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2022-01-07 01:04:58 | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |
Previous Message | Euler Taveira | 2022-01-07 00:33:07 | fix libpq comment |