From: | "Henshall, Stuart - WCP" <SHenshall(at)westcountrypublications(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "'Glenn MacGregor'" <gtm(at)oracom(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Transaction and cascade problem |
Date: | 2001-12-21 14:12:27 |
Message-ID: | E2870D8CE1CCD311BAF50008C71EDE8E01F74767@MAIL_EXCHANGE |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
IIRC this was for some perceived problem with foreign keys, however on
hackers a while back it was talked about and I believe decided that it
wasn't necessary after all and has been taken out. You might have more luck
therefore with 7.2, or altering 7.1 to take this out (however I'm not 100%
sure on this so check the hackers archives).
- Stuart
-----Original Message-----
From: Glenn MacGregor [mailto:gtm(at)oracom(dot)com]
Sent: 20 December 2001 13:32
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Transaction and cascade problem
Hi All,
I have postgres 7.1 set up with two tables (groups, users). groups has 2
columns name, groupid where id is the primary key autoincrement and name is
unique. users has 3 columns name, userid, groupid. I have a constraint on
users which says that groupid must exists in the group table. I also have a
cascade delete on the groups table to delete any users that are in the group
I am removing. I regular (no transaction) mode everything works fine. When
I start a transaction and I add a group to the group table, then delete it
before a commit or rollback I get the following error:
ERROR: triggered data change violation on relation "groups"
After that the transaction must be rolledback. Any clues?
Thanks
Glenn
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Archibald Zimonyi | 2001-12-21 15:08:07 | Re: NULL values or not? |
Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2001-12-21 13:09:53 | Re: should temporary tables show up in \dt as type "temporary" or as something? |