| From: | Paul Förster <paul(dot)foerster(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_checksums? |
| Date: | 2023-10-31 13:58:17 |
| Message-ID: | E23CEC24-7B44-480D-B7B4-CF8D9FB34B9D@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Alexander,
> On Oct 30, 2023, at 19:49, Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> That's not what I said.
That's why I asked. Because you used the word orthogonal. 🤣
> Patroni only manages Postgres. It is exactly the same Postgres as you would run it without Patroni.
> Everything will work.
Now that is, what I suspected because of what I have learned how Patroni (and PostgreSQL replication) works so far.
Thanks very much.
Cheers
Paul
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | veem v | 2023-10-31 21:49:29 | Question on Aurora postgres |
| Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2023-10-31 08:44:54 | Re: xmax not zero? |