| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | pgsql: Use MAX_PARALLEL_WORKER_LIMIT for max_parallel_maintenance_worke |
| Date: | 2024-10-13 02:35:40 |
| Message-ID: | E1szoSK-000WCV-Ux@gemulon.postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Use MAX_PARALLEL_WORKER_LIMIT for max_parallel_maintenance_workers
max_parallel_maintenance_workers has been introduced in 9da0cc35284b,
and used a hardcoded limit of 1024 rather than this variable.
max_parallel_workers and max_parallel_workers_per_gather already used
MAX_PARALLEL_WORKER_LIMIT (1024) as their upper-bound since
6599c9ac3340.
Author: Matthias van de Meent
Reviewed-by: Zhang Mingli
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEze2WiCiJD+8Wig_wGPyn4vgdPjbnYXy2Rw+9KYi6izTMuP=w@mail.gmail.com
Branch
------
master
Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/c0b74323dc7b47644f074cf98597723ca55b2309
Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2024-10-13 20:44:34 | pgsql: Fixup for pg_set_relation_stats(). |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-10-12 18:56:21 | pgsql: Correctly identify which EC members are computable at a plan nod |