From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | pgsql: Fix asserts in fast-path locking code |
Date: | 2024-09-23 09:44:04 |
Message-ID: | E1ssfbv-000WVf-M1@gemulon.postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Fix asserts in fast-path locking code
Commit c4d5cb71d229 introduced a couple asserts in the fast-path locking
code, upsetting Coverity.
The assert in InitProcGlobal() is clearly wrong, as it assigns instead
of checking the value. This is harmless, but doesn't check anything.
The asserts in FAST_PATH_ macros are written as if for signed values,
but the macros are only called for unsigned ones. That makes the check
for (val >= 0) useless. Checks written as ((uint32) x < max) work for
both signed and unsigned values. Negative values should wrap to values
greater than INT32_MAX.
Per Coverity, report by Tom Lane.
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2891628.1727019959@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
------
master
Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/a7e5237f268ea378c514635d65a55aa47621958a
Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 8 ++++----
src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-09-23 10:11:44 | pgsql: Translation updates |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2024-09-23 07:51:26 | pgsql: Add memory/disk usage for more executor nodes. |