pgsql: Fix asserts in fast-path locking code

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pgsql: Fix asserts in fast-path locking code
Date: 2024-09-23 09:44:04
Message-ID: E1ssfbv-000WVf-M1@gemulon.postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Fix asserts in fast-path locking code

Commit c4d5cb71d229 introduced a couple asserts in the fast-path locking
code, upsetting Coverity.

The assert in InitProcGlobal() is clearly wrong, as it assigns instead
of checking the value. This is harmless, but doesn't check anything.

The asserts in FAST_PATH_ macros are written as if for signed values,
but the macros are only called for unsigned ones. That makes the check
for (val >= 0) useless. Checks written as ((uint32) x < max) work for
both signed and unsigned values. Negative values should wrap to values
greater than INT32_MAX.

Per Coverity, report by Tom Lane.

Reported-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2891628.1727019959@sss.pgh.pa.us

Branch
------
master

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/a7e5237f268ea378c514635d65a55aa47621958a

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 8 ++++----
src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-09-23 10:11:44 pgsql: Translation updates
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2024-09-23 07:51:26 pgsql: Add memory/disk usage for more executor nodes.