From: | Alexander Korotkov <akorotkov(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | pgsql: reindexdb: Add the index-level REINDEX with multiple jobs |
Date: | 2024-03-25 00:07:24 |
Message-ID: | E1roXs4-005UdX-1V@gemulon.postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
reindexdb: Add the index-level REINDEX with multiple jobs
Straight-forward index-level REINDEX is not supported with multiple jobs as
we cannot control the concurrent processing of multiple indexes depending on
the same relation. Instead, we dedicate the whole table to certain reindex
job. Thus, if indexes in the lists belong to different tables, that gives us
a fair level of parallelism.
This commit teaches get_parallel_object_list() to fetch table names for
indexes in the case of index-level REINDEX. The same tables are grouped
together in the output order, and the list of indexes is also rebuilt to
match that order. Later during processingof that list, we push indexes
belonging to the same table into the same job.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACG%3DezZU_VwDi-1PN8RUSE6mcYG%2BYx1NH_rJO4%2BKe-mKqLp%3DNw%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Maxim Orlov, Svetlana Derevyanko, Alexander Korotkov
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Branch
------
master
Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/47f99a407de224df6f9c43697d0a9c0a5598b250
Modified Files
--------------
doc/src/sgml/ref/reindexdb.sgml | 3 +-
src/bin/scripts/reindexdb.c | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
src/bin/scripts/t/090_reindexdb.pl | 8 +-
3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2024-03-25 01:32:05 | pgsql: Allow planner to use Merge Append to efficiently implement UNION |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2024-03-24 23:40:22 | pgsql: Fix convert_case(), introduced in 5c40364dd6. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2024-03-25 01:02:18 | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum |
Previous Message | jian he | 2024-03-25 00:00:00 | Re: Adding OLD/NEW support to RETURNING |