pgsql: Improve psql \?'s description of large-object-related commands.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pgsql: Improve psql \?'s description of large-object-related commands.
Date: 2022-06-03 19:49:44
Message-ID: E1nxDIl-002YYr-NV@gemulon.postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Improve psql \?'s description of large-object-related commands.

Provide a gloss of which command does what, as all other backslash
commands have. Put the large-object command section into a more
considered spot in the list.

In passing, update the output-lines count in helpVariables()
(oversight in 7844c9918, looks like).

Thibaud Walkowiak, reviewed by Nathan Bossart and myself

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/43f0439c-df3e-a045-ac99-af33523cc2d4@dalibo.com

Branch
------
master

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/1fbe94084fd34200e61dd1db6225e8c8c65c000d

Modified Files
--------------
src/bin/psql/help.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-06-04 03:19:53 pgsql: Force run of pg_upgrade in the build directory in its TAP test
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-06-03 17:55:23 pgsql: Doc: improve example for intarray's uniq() function.