| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | pgsql: Reword text on ROW SHARE lock as acquired by SELECT FOR <lock> |
| Date: | 2022-04-14 19:55:56 |
| Message-ID: | E1nf5ZM-000Wib-5A@gemulon.postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Reword text on ROW SHARE lock as acquired by SELECT FOR <lock>
It was missing lock levels FOR KEY SHARE and FOR NO KEY EXCLUSIVE; but
also SELECT FOR UPDATE is not a command separate from SELECT, as the
original text implied. It is clearer to state that FOR <lock strength>
is an option of regular SELECT.
Per suggestion from Joey Bodoia <jbodoia21(at)cmc(dot)edu>
Reviewed-by: Joey Bodoia <jbodoia21(at)cmc(dot)edu> (offlist)
Reviewed-by: Erikjan Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/164908765512.682.17348032020747341013@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Branch
------
master
Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/275e719d910459db747346a51d56185e2440763b
Modified Files
--------------
doc/src/sgml/mvcc.sgml | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-04-14 20:23:03 | pgsql: Have CLUSTER ignore partitions not owned by caller |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-04-14 16:14:06 | pgsql: Temporarily add some probes of tenk1's relallvisible in create_i |