From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | pgsql: dshash: revise sequential scan support. |
Date: | 2022-04-04 21:33:55 |
Message-ID: | E1nbUKg-000Kyv-Lu@gemulon.postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
dshash: revise sequential scan support.
The previous coding of dshash_seq_next(), on the first call, accessed
status->hash_table->size_log2 without holding a partition lock and without
guaranteeing that ensure_valid_bucket_pointers() had ever been called.
That oversight turns out to not have immediately visible effects, because
bucket 0 is always in partition 0, and ensure_valid_bucket_pointers() was
called after acquiring the partition lock. However,
PARTITION_FOR_BUCKET_INDEX() with a size_log2 of 0 ends up triggering formally
undefined behaviour.
Simplify by accessing partition 0, without using PARTITION_FOR_BUCKET_INDEX().
While at it, remove dshash_get_current(), there is no convincing use
case. Also polish a few comments.
Author: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Reviewed-By: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKGL9hY_VY=+oUK+Gc1iSRx-Ls5qeYJ6q=dQVZnT3R63Taw@mail.gmail.com
Branch
------
master
Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/909eebf27b9e6aaa78fb3338f7d8fbc7fa174247
Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/lib/dshash.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
src/include/lib/dshash.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Erik Rijkers | 2022-04-04 22:16:52 | Re: pgsql: JSON_TABLE |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-04-04 20:54:04 | pgsql: pgstat: consistent function comment formatting. |