pgsql: Doc: be clearer that foreign-table partitions need user-added co

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pgsql: Doc: be clearer that foreign-table partitions need user-added co
Date: 2022-02-05 17:56:05
Message-ID: E1nGPI5-00068G-2h@gemulon.postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Doc: be clearer that foreign-table partitions need user-added constraints.

A very well-informed user might deduce this from what we said already,
but I'd bet against it. Lay it out explicitly.

While here, rewrite the comment about tuple routing to be more
intelligible to an average SQL user.

Per bug #17395 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to v11. (The text
in this area is different in v10 and I'm not sufficiently excited
about this point to adapt the patch.)

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17395-8c326292078d1a57@postgresql.org

Branch
------
REL_14_STABLE

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/d0cd7b77265cf39e0e8984ba9d5bec0c155dccdb

Modified Files
--------------
doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml | 9 ++++++---
doc/src/sgml/ref/create_foreign_table.sgml | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-02-06 03:27:46 pgsql: pg_upgrade: Move all the files generated internally to a subdire
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-02-05 17:00:00 pgsql: Test, don't just Assert, that mergejoin's inputs are in order.