From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | pgsql: Fix subtransaction test for Python 3.10 |
Date: | 2021-06-17 07:05:07 |
Message-ID: | E1ltm5L-0006yX-SF@gemulon.postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Fix subtransaction test for Python 3.10
Starting with Python 3.10, the stacktrace looks differently:
- PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 3, in <module>
- s.__exit__(None, None, None)
+ PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 2, in <module>
+ with plpy.subtransaction() as s:
Using try/except specifically makes the error look always the same.
(See https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25719 for the discussion
of this change in Python.)
Author: Honza Horak <hhorak(at)redhat(dot)com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/853083.1620749597%40sss.pgh.pa.us
RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959080
Branch
------
REL9_6_STABLE
Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/9c31e4165522eb510123a05597f541dadff4e679
Modified Files
--------------
src/pl/plpython/expected/plpython_subtransaction.out | 11 +++++++----
src/pl/plpython/sql/plpython_subtransaction.sql | 7 +++++--
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2021-06-17 11:28:36 | Re: pgsql: Make archiver process an auxiliary process. |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-06-17 06:25:16 | pgsql: Document a few caveats in synchronous logical replication. |