From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | pgsql: doc: Clarify status of SELECT INTO on reference page |
Date: | 2021-01-30 10:26:11 |
Message-ID: | E1l5nSF-0005BG-NN@gemulon.postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
doc: Clarify status of SELECT INTO on reference page
The documentation as well as source code comments weren't entirely
clear whether SELECT INTO was truly deprecated (thus in theory
destined to be removed eventually), or just a less recommended
variant. After discussion, it appears that other implementations also
use SELECT INTO in direct SQL in a way similar to PostgreSQL, so it
seems worth keeping it for compatibility. Update the language in the
documentation to that effect.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/96dc0df3-e13a-a85d-d045-d6e2c85218da%40enterprisedb.com
Branch
------
master
Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/65330622441d7ee08f768c4326825ae903f2595a
Modified Files
--------------
doc/src/sgml/ref/select_into.sgml | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-01-30 18:48:31 | pgsql: Add primary keys and unique constraints to system catalogs |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-01-30 08:51:16 | pgsql: Allow GRANTED BY clause in normal GRANT and REVOKE statements |