| From: | David Rowley <drowley(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | pgsql: Use int64 instead of long in incremental sort code |
| Date: | 2020-08-02 02:25:07 |
| Message-ID: | E1k23gR-0001Bh-0K@gemulon.postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Use int64 instead of long in incremental sort code
Windows 64bit has 4-byte long values which is not suitable for tracking
disk space usage in the incremental sort code. Let's just make all these
fields int64s.
Author: James Coleman
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpky%2BUhof8mryPf5i%3D6e6fib2dxHqBrhp0Qhu0NeBhLJw%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13, where the incremental sort code was added
Branch
------
master
Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/6ee3b5fb990ea11992b0db960d79b1fbe7b5e8e5
Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/commands/explain.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
src/include/nodes/execnodes.h | 8 ++++----
src/include/utils/tuplesort.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2020-08-02 03:01:51 | Re: pgsql: Fix some issues with step generation in partition pruning. |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2020-08-02 02:24:35 | pgsql: Use int64 instead of long in incremental sort code |