pgsql: Cosmetic improvements in ltree code.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pgsql: Cosmetic improvements in ltree code.
Date: 2020-03-29 23:14:24
Message-ID: E1jIh8K-0004CJ-AV@gemulon.postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Cosmetic improvements in ltree code.

Add more comments in ltree.h, and correct a misstatement or two.

Use a symbol, rather than hardwired constants, for the maximum length
of an ltree label. The max length is still hardwired in the associated
error messages, but I want to clean that up as part of a separate patch
to improve the error messages.

Branch
------
master

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/2743d9ae4a490a7d96b5c19d50694bd101a87dc8

Modified Files
--------------
contrib/ltree/ltree.h | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
contrib/ltree/ltree_io.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-03-30 02:08:46 Re: pgsql: Allow vacuum command to process indexes in parallel.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-03-29 22:54:43 pgsql: Doc: correct misstatement about ltree label maximum length.