From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | pgsql: Fix off-by-one error in PGTYPEStimestamp_fmt_asc |
Date: | 2019-11-30 14:19:13 |
Message-ID: | E1ib3ab-0002zn-H0@gemulon.postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Fix off-by-one error in PGTYPEStimestamp_fmt_asc
When using %b or %B patterns to format a date, the code was simply using
tm_mon as an index into array of month names. But that is wrong, because
tm_mon is 1-based, while array indexes are 0-based. The result is we
either use name of the next month, or a segfault (for December).
Fix by subtracting 1 from tm_mon for both patterns, and add a regression
test triggering the issue. Backpatch to all supported versions (the bug
is there far longer, since at least 2003).
Reported-by: Paul Spencer
Backpatch-through: 9.4
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16143-0d861eb8688d3fef%40postgresql.org
Branch
------
REL_12_STABLE
Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/0dafed6fedf4da0e0e38c5961ae4b1540b4a8a5c
Modified Files
--------------
src/interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib/timestamp.c | 4 ++--
.../ecpg/test/expected/pgtypeslib-dt_test.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++----
.../ecpg/test/expected/pgtypeslib-dt_test.stderr | 2 +-
.../ecpg/test/expected/pgtypeslib-dt_test.stdout | 2 ++
src/interfaces/ecpg/test/pgtypeslib/dt_test.pgc | 16 +++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-11-30 14:19:26 | pgsql: Fix off-by-one error in PGTYPEStimestamp_fmt_asc |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-11-30 14:18:57 | pgsql: Fix off-by-one error in PGTYPEStimestamp_fmt_asc |